Mode 1 is you typing questions and a persona answering in real time. It’s the right mode when you want to follow your instincts, push on something specific, or genuinely have a conversation. Here’s how it works.
Open any persona’s detail page from the personas list and click the Interview tab. That’s where sessions start, live or completed. Each persona has its own session history; switching personas means switching contexts.
You type a question and hit Send message. Behind the scenes Candor does three things in sequence: it generates the persona’s response, runs a critic agent over that response for consistency, and then delivers it to you. You don’t see the intermediate generate/validate steps; you see the final turn with metadata attached.
Each delivered turn shows you:
The critic is a separate agent. Its job is to make sure the persona doesn’t drift mid-conversation. There are two severities. Hard contradiction: the response directly conflicts with an established belief or prior turn. These are caught and either regenerated or flagged so you can judge. Soft tension: the response is consistent but the tone or emphasis shifted in a way worth noting. These are tracked in the background but not surfaced inline.
The critic is what stops a Candor interview from devolving into agreeable AI prose. A persona who said earlier price isn’t the issue can’t turn around three turns later and say price is everything without either explaining why their stance changed or being flagged.
This is the part most people miss. The persona remembers the entire conversation, and they remember every prior session you ran with them inside the same project. End a session, come back tomorrow, start a new one, and the persona will refer back to what you discussed last time, including stance changes (which get logged explicitly, with a reason).
You can see prior session summaries from the persona detail page. They’re generated automatically when a session ends, distilling what was discussed and how the persona’s beliefs moved.
Memory alone isn’t enough to keep a persona consistent across many sessions, so Candor also keeps a ledger of the facts a persona has established about themselves. Their role, their circumstances, things they told you happened. Once a fact is in that ledger, it’s fixed. A persona who told you in session one that they manage a team of six cannot quietly become a solo contributor in session four.
Opinions are treated differently. Beliefs and preferences are allowed to move, but only with an explicit, logged reason. That’s the distinction to hold on to: contradictions in the facts are bugs, and shifts in the opinions are findings.
Personas have a snapshot of recent industry and region developments from the time the audience was generated. If you’re running a session weeks later and want the persona to know about something that’s changed in the industry, Refresh industry context rebuilds that snapshot. Use it sparingly. It pulls fresh evidence and recalibrates.
A refresh is also the one moment a persona is allowed to have moved on. Between refreshes the persona is effectively frozen in time, which is what makes a mid-session change a contradiction rather than an update. Refreshing opens a new window in which their circumstances can legitimately have changed, which is another reason not to do it casually in the middle of a study.
Click End interview when you’re done. A confirmation appears. Once you confirm, Candor generates a session summary from the transcript and the session moves into the persona’s history. You can re-open the transcript anytime, but you can’t add to a closed session. Start a new one if you have more to ask.
Be the first to know when it launches.
No spam. Just a note when Candor is ready. Powered by Highline Beta.